Sunday, 6 September 2020

The World Bank Suspends her ´Doing Business´ Index

 

The World Bank Suspends her ´Doing Business´ Index

It was about time.

The World Bank has now suspended the publication of its global business climate index after identifying “irregularities” in its data that may have affected the ranking of emerging countries. I have criticised the use (and misuse) of governance indicators since long, not only for lack of data integrity and not just the ´Ease of Doing Business´ (EoDB) index. Most recently, joint with Robert Kappel, in our FES study on the ´G20 Compact with Africa´[1].

EoDB Indicators have been provided from 2003 onwards on a yearly basis by the International Finance Corporation, the private-finance arm of the World Bank Group (IFC). The EoDB puts up a global beauty contest for investors: processes for business incorporation, ease of getting a building permit, obtaining an electricity connection, transferring property, getting access to credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, engaging in international trade, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. Labour market deregulation (e.g. the ease to fire workers) had already been discontinued from EoDB rankings, in the wake of early protests by the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU).[2]

The EoDB index has been subject to heavy criticism since a while, notably at the OECD Development Centre[3]. Early 2018, the World Bank’s chief economist at the time, Paul Romer, told the Wall Street Journal he had lost faith in the integrity of the Doing Business index, suggesting it was being politically manipulated—particularly to embarrass Chile’s socialist president Michelle Bachelet. He then announced his resignation.

Two EoDB Heroes



Chile was not a single ´accident´. India’s rise in the Doing Business rankings celebrated by India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi (“the largest democracy on earth is also the fastest growing major economy”) turned out to be mostly an artefact of methodological changes (as did India´s faked numbers of growth). CGD author Justin Sandefur has urged that the World Bank “Should Ditch the "Doing Business" Rankings”[4]. And, on the heels of a massive arms deal with the US[5], Saudi Arabia sharply improved her rankings in the 2019 Doing Business report. (Mind you, the 2020 G20 Riyadh summit is still scheduled for November. Honi soit qui mal y pense.)

Governance indicators fail for a variety of reasons that I have exposed here[6] and there[7]. Especially harmful is global investors´ beauty contest contest indicator (EoDB), as eloquently summarised by former UNECA head Carlos Lopez: “The global investor focus on the index had encouraged countries to prioritise creating low-tax, low-regulation environments, sometimes at the expense of macroeconomic considerations. It makes countries compete into some sort of race to the bottom against the expectation that they will be rewarded with more FDI when in fact what matters most for investors is stability, predictability and regulatory clarity”[8].



[1] Robert Kappel & Helmut Reisen (2019), "G20 Compact with Africa: The Audacity of Hope", Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

[3] Christiane Arndt and Charles P. Oman (2006), Uses and Abuses of Governance Indicators, Paris: OECD Development Centre Policy Studies.

[4] Justin Sandefur & Divyanshi Wadhwa (2018), „Chart of the Week #3: Why the World Bank Should Ditch the ´Doing Business´ Rankings—in One Embarrassing Chart”, Washington, DC: Center for Global Development (CDG).

[6] Helmut Reisen & Dilan Ölcer (2009), “Extracting more from EITI”, voxeu.org, 17. February.

[7] Helmut Reisen (2019), “The Abuse of Governance Indicators”, ShiftingWealth Blog, 25. June.

[8] Tom Wilson (2020), “World Bank suspends its business climate index over data ‘irregularities’”, Financial Times, 28. August.

No comments:

Post a Comment