For what it's worth, let's consult a paper that I wrote with Julia von Maltzan in 1999*, a rating event study exploring the market response for 30 trading days before and after rating announcements. The Figure shows the mean of relative yield spreads before and after 103 rating events.
In general, the Figure conveys that a change in the risk assessment by the three leading rating agencies is preceded by a similar change in the market’s assessment of sovereign risk. The pattern is particularly clear when countries have been put on review for possible downgrade or upgrade. During the 29 days preceding a review for possible downgrade, relative spreads rise by about 12 percentage points.
For the Euro countries down graded before the weekend another of our result augurs badly, notwithstanding France's successful bond auction today: Implemented negative rating changes seem to exert a sustained impact on bond yield spreads: the rating downgrade is largely unanticipated. After a country’s rating has been downgraded, the market appears to vindicate the agencies’ assessment over the next 30 trading days with an upward movement in relative yield spreads.
Implement downgrades of emerging-market bonds were shown in our study to produce a strongly significant market reaction: During 30 trading days, from ten days before the press release issued by the rating agency to 20 days thereafter, relative yield spreads widen significantly by an accumulated 12.7 percentage points.
* Helmut Reisen and Julia von Maltzan (1999), "Boom and Bust and Sovereign Ratings", International Finance, Vol.2:2, pp.273-293.
So ratings agencies are markey followers ? That would be reassuring.
ReplyDeleteGuy
Guy, yes normally sovereign ratings follow spread developments. But as internal industry guidelines and regulations stipulate to observe investment-grade ratings, rating downgrades do have subsequent market impact, as shown in the graph.
ReplyDeleteHelmut