Data
on lending sources for bank credit to Africa are hard to come by. Notably the
People’s Bank of China, the China Development Bank, and the Export-Import Bank
of China (Exim Bank of China), have supported large-scale investments in
African infrastructure but do not publish up-to-date information (Pigato and
Tang, 2015). For other bilateral and multilateral lenders, ECN (2015) lists the
World Bank, African Development Bank, Development Bank of Southern Africa,
Export-Import Bank of the United States, African Export-Import Bank, European
Investment Bank, Agence Française de développement (AFD), Japan Bank for
International Cooperation (JBIC), Islamic Development Bank and Kreditanstalt
für Wiederaufbau as largest creditors.
Despite
steady growth in private sector funding in the past decade, official
development finance backs 80% of infrastructure funding, with China heading the list of investors,
according to a report released late 2015 (ECN, 2015). An important source of
foreign finance for Africa stems from official creditors, including export
credit agencies. According to the Infrastructure
Consortium for Africa Report 2013, grants compose around 30% of the funding
extended, while 67% are based on bank credit and export credit flows.
Table1. Funding commitments by origin, USD billion
Origin
|
2013
|
2014
|
China
|
13.4
|
3.1
|
Europe
(incl. EIB)
|
7.4
|
6.4
|
United
States
|
7.0
|
n.a.
|
World Bank
|
4.5
|
6.5
|
AfDB
|
3.6
|
3.6
|
Arab
Coordination
|
3.3
|
3.5
|
Japan
|
1.5
|
2.1
|
South
Africa (DBSA)
|
1.2
|
1.0
|
Total
|
99.6
|
74.5
|
Net
official credit flows (disbursements minus amortisation) have declined in 2015,
mainly due to a heavy amortisation schedule on bilateral liabilities.
Amortisation payments to bilateral official creditors jumped to USD 13 billion
in 2015 and are projected at that level also for 2016. This compares to much
lower amortisation payments in former years during the 2009–14 period, when
amortisation to bilateral s averaged USD 5.4 billion. Northern Africa has seen
net official bank credit flows curtailed, as bilateral credit to the region has
turned negative from 2014, mostly as a result of Egypt´s heavy amortization
schedule over recent years. Main borrowers of bilateral loans in Sub-Saharan
Africa were Republic of Congo and Côte d´Ivoire, reflecting bilateral loan
agreements with China. While in 2013 bilateral official lending (53.7% of
total) to Africa outpaced multilateral lending, it fell back below multilateral
lending in 2014.
In
terms of net official bank credit inflows to Africa, therefore, multilateral
development banks currently provide the most significant volume of bank credit
resources to Africa (World Bank, 2016). While net bilateral bank credit flows have
dropped since 2014, the rise of net multilateral bank disbursements to
Sub-Saharan Africa has continued unabated. New gross multilateral disbursements
for African borrowers have risen to record levels, USD 17.3 billion in
2015. They are projected to rise further
in 2016 as AIIB lending to Africa´s east coast will start to contribute.
References
ECN (2015), Spanning Africa´s Infrastructure Gap: How development capital is
transforming Africa’s project build-out, London: The Economist Corporate
Network, November.
ICA (2015), Infrastructure Financing Trends in Africa –
2014. Infrastructure
Consortium Africa
Pigato,
M. and W. Tang (2015), China and Africa: Expanding Economic Ties in
an Evolving Global Context,
Washington, DC ; World Bank.
World
Bank (2016), International Debt Statistics.
No comments:
Post a Comment