The doomsayers will have to wait further for their collapse scenarios on China finally to materialize. The World Bank has just lifted its 2017 forecast for economic growth in China amid rising household incomes and a recovery in global trade[1].
China’s and India’s high growth has boosted
global growth in recent years (Figure 1). From 2011 to 2015, China’s relative
contribution to global growth was on a par with advanced countries, despite its
per capita GDP growth falling from a top rate of 13.6 % in 2007 to 6.1 % in
2016. India’s contribution to global growth has also risen since the early
2000s, on the back of a per capita income growth rate oscillating between 8.8 %
in 2010 and 5.9% in 2016. However, China has contributed almost 30% to global growth
in recent years, approximately 20 percentage points more than India. As India
is still considerably poorer than China, it cannot yet offset the impact of
China’s slowdown on global growth and trade.
Figure 1: Contribution
to global growth, 1991-2015, by areas (%)
Source: AEO
2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888933349957
Meanwhile, India has taken the lead over China
in terms of GDP growth (but not per capita), with favorable demographics that
encourage domestic savings and investment. In the future decades, Shifting
Wealth may well benefit from a twin-turbo, China and India. Twin-turbo refers to the turbocharger configuration in which two
identical turbochargers function simultaneously, splitting the turbocharging
duties equally. Each turbocharger is driven by half of the engine's spent
exhaust energy. A twin-turbocharger relying on China and India would be
good news for convergence and for the world economy, counteracting the backlash
emanating from populism and protectionism in the US and Europe.
Ever since the
1990s, there has been much talk about China´s growth slowing down. But China´s
slowdown has been overhyped in Western media recently, while India has been celebrated
as the new top-growth country. In per capita terms, however, China still leads
India. China´s growth has been coming
down from unsustainable levels, while India´s growth has been rising, erratically
so due to her exposure to weather conditions. In recent years, growth in both
Asian giants has comfortably settled above 5 percent per annum.
Figure
2: GDP real per
capita growth (annual %), 1990 - 2016
Source: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZG?end=2016&locations=CN-IN-1W&start=1990
The June 2017
issue of the World Bank´s Global Economic Prospects predicts real GDP growth at
6.3 percent for both 2018 and 2019; India´s growth is forecast to reach 7.5 and
7.7 percent, respectively, in the two forthcoming years. Current annual
population growth is 0.5 percent in China and 1.2 percent in India. So in real
terms, per capita income growth is forecast to be superior in India than in
China, albeit just by roughly half a percentage point.
Table 1: Percent of real global GDP
Growth, forecast 2017 – 2019
China
|
35.2
|
USA
|
17.9
|
India
|
8.6
|
EU
|
7.9
|
Indonesia
|
2.5
|
Brazil
|
1.2
|
Russia
|
1.0
|
Even so, Table 1
suggests that India is still far from contributing to global GDP growth on
equal terms with China. Mind you, India is forecast to contribute 8.6% to
global growth (based on the cited World Bank numbers), and that exceeds the EU
contribution. Meanwhile, China will support more than a third of world economic
growth during the end of the current decade.
For the moment, the world economy doesn´t enjoy a twin-turbo China-India quite yet. India is still too poor to meaningfully contribute: its GDP/capita relative to the USA stood at 11.6 percent in 2016. China´s per capita income stood at 26.7 percent of US mean per capita income (Figure3). Compared to the US, among the five BRICS countries only China and India have converged to US per capita income levels since 1990 and 2016.
Figure 3: Convergence to US GDP/cap, 1990-2016
Source: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2017/02/weodata/weoselgr.aspx
For the moment, the world economy doesn´t enjoy a twin-turbo China-India quite yet. India is still too poor to meaningfully contribute: its GDP/capita relative to the USA stood at 11.6 percent in 2016. China´s per capita income stood at 26.7 percent of US mean per capita income (Figure3). Compared to the US, among the five BRICS countries only China and India have converged to US per capita income levels since 1990 and 2016.
Figure 4: Trade (% of GDP)
Another concern
is that trade shares (% of GDP) have been dropping in India from 56 percent in
2012 to below 40 percent in 2016. India´s weak export performance reflects her
dependence on commodity exports and a poorly diversified export basket[2].
To be sure,
China´s trade shares have been dropping even more but this was a welcome
outcome of rebalancing the country toward more consumption. In any case, the
drop in trade shares observed in both Asian (Figure 3) giants translates
domestic GDP growth mechanically into lower contribution to global growth. The
twin-turbo support to the world economy in turn relies on an open trade system.
With the US retreat from multilateralism under Trump, the twin-turbo engine is
likely to stutter for a while.
No comments:
Post a Comment